court appointments of interim U.S

As the 2005 dispute over the U.S. Attorney in South Dakota suggests, Section 546 has sometimes given rise to disputes between the executive and judicial branches. Some have argued the judicial appointment of executive officials violates the constitutional separation of powers. Lower courts that have considered Section 546(d) have rejected separation-of-powers challenges to the appointments scheme, approving of district court appointments of interim U.S. Attorneys. Another source of possible contention under the statute’s appointment scheme concerns removal—in particular, whether the President can remove an official appointed by a district court. Certain statements in Supreme Court and federal appeals court cases instruct ดูหนังออนไลน์